<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gadgetizer.com &#187; The Continuing Battle Between AT&amp;T &amp; Verizon Wireless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gadgetizer.com/tag/the-continuing-battle-between-att-verizon-wireless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gadgetizer.com</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and tech news. Get daily reviews of gadgets and the latest tech news at Gadgetizer.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:48:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Continuing Battle Between AT&amp;T &amp; Verizon Wireless</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetizer.com/2009/11/18/the-continuing-battle-between-att-verizon-wireless/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gadgetizer.com/2009/11/18/the-continuing-battle-between-att-verizon-wireless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>H-Bag</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tid Bits and News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Continuing Battle Between AT&T & Verizon Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetizer.com/?p=4984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know that AT&#38;T wasn&#8217;t at all pleased with the recent Verizon Wireless ads, as seen by the now lawsuit against the company.
AT&#38;T filed a temporary restraining order of Verizon&#8217;s coverage map-based ads and now it&#8217;s on and on till the crack of dawn. Verizon is punching back at the AT&#38;T suit by stating,  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-4985" title="att-verizon-map-coverage" src="http://www.gadgetizer.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/att-verizon-map-coverage-300x198.jpg" alt="att-verizon-map-coverage" width="300" height="198" />We all know that AT&amp;T wasn&#8217;t at all pleased with the recent <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2355972,00.asp">Verizon Wireless ads</a>, as seen by the now lawsuit against the company.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T filed a temporary restraining order of Verizon&#8217;s coverage map-based ads and now it&#8217;s on and on till the crack of dawn. Verizon is punching back at the AT&amp;T suit by stating,  “AT&amp;T did not file this lawsuit because Verizon&#8217;s &#8216;There&#8217;s A Map For That&#8217; advertisements are untrue; AT&amp;T sued because Verizon&#8217;s ads are true and the truth hurts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow, these guys play dirty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetizer.com/2009/11/18/the-continuing-battle-between-att-verizon-wireless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

